Background

Why longer vesting isn’t hostile, it’s protection.

Joakim Achren

When investors ask for longer vesting (say, 5 years with a 2-year cliff), many founders see it as unfair, even predatory.

Here’s the truth: it’s not about control, it’s about safeguarding the company.

Early-stage startups go through multiple rounds. Each new investor looks closely at the cap table. If a founder can walk away after a year or two with 20% of the company, that’s dead equity.

Imagine being that next investor. You’d see 20% of the cap table not contributing to growth. Not a good look.

Longer vesting isn’t a trap. It’s alignment, making sure everyone is building for the long term.

Login to enjoy full advantages

Please login or subscribe to continue.

Go Premium!

Enjoy the full advantage of the premium access.

Stop following

Unfollow Cancel

Cancel subscription

Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.

Go back Confirm cancellation